Blog

You can count on us to help provide the information you need to protect your business and serve your clients more effectively.

SECURE Act Takes Aim at the Retirement Savings Gap

by | Feb 25, 2020

Many studies have shown that Americans are not saving enough for retirement. A surprising number of employees still do not even have access to a 401(k) savings plan. Several provisions of the recently enacted SECURE Act address this retirement savings gap by encouraging employers who currently do not sponsor 401(k) plans to adopt them. The SECURE Act also creates new incentives for 401(k) plan sponsors to help increase participants’ retirement savings and to provide them with a steady stream of income when they leave the workforce. In the longer term, beginning after 2023, the SECURE Act will additionally require 401(k) plans to allow long service part-time employees to make their own contributions (which need not be matched).

Here are some of the new opportunities for sponsors and potential sponsors to consider.

Tax Credits for New Plans and Auto-Enrollment Plans

The tax credit for small employers who start new retirement plans increases from $500 per year to as much as $5,000 per year for three years. There is also a new $500 per year tax credit for new plans that include automatic enrollment.

Additional Time to Adopt New Plans and Safe Harbor Provisions

An employer may now decide to adopt a plan after the end of the plan year and up to its tax return deadline. The prior deadline was the last day of the initial plan year. However, a plan adopted after the end of the plan year must be employer-funded and cannot permit retroactive employee contributions.

Safe harbor 401(k) plans are popular ways to avoid having to refund excess contributions when plans fail to pass nondiscrimination testing. They may be designed to either match employee contributions or to provide a nonelective contribution to every employee who has satisfied the plan’s eligibility requirements. Previously, employers could notify employees in advance that they might adopt a nonelective safe harbor provision in the next plan year. If this “maybe notice” was given, employers could adopt a nonelective safe harbor plan up to 30 days before the end of the plan year.

An employer may now decide to adopt nonelective safe harbor 401(k) provisions at any time up to the end of the subsequent plan year without giving the advance “maybe notice” to employees. This enables the plan sponsor to consider the financial results for the complete year before making a decision. Converting a plan to a nonelective safe harbor plan may also be a useful option for plans that are not passing nondiscrimination testing for the plan year. However, if the nonelective provisions are adopted after the old deadline, a minimum nonelective contribution of 4% of compensation must be given to participants instead of the 3% contribution usually required.

New Higher Limits for Auto-Enrollment

Numerous studies have shown that automatic enrollment of employees increases retirement savings. If the employer has adopted a type of safe harbor plan with automatic enrollment contributions ( called a QACA), the maximum permissible percentage of pay that may be subject to automatic enrollment has been increased from 10% to 15%.

Pooled Employer Plans Limit Fiduciary Responsibility

Fear of fiduciary responsibility and fear of being sued for a fiduciary breach deter smaller employers from adopting plans. The SECURE Act created a new type of plan called a pooled employer plan, or PEP, that permits unrelated employers to participate in a plan with professional management and consolidated reporting. PEPs are expected to benefit from economies of scale that should result in lower fees.

Banks, insurance companies, recordkeepers and investment firms are expected to be interested in offering PEPs. The fiduciary responsibility of employers participating in PEPs is limited to prudently selecting the providers and, if the arrangement does not provide for investment management by a professional fiduciary, for plan investments. The day-to-day administration will be handled by a responsible professional.

PEPs will not be available until 2021, but they are expected to expand the 401(k) marketplace.

New Safe Harbor for Selecting Annuity Providers

Although 401(k) plans are the primary source of retirement income for most employees, many plans still provide that distributions may be made only in lump sums. The employees are responsible for investing the lump sum to provide retirement income, and many do not do so. Annuity payment options solve this problem by converting the account balance into a lifetime income stream. However, employers have been reluctant to include them due to fear of being sued if the insurer encounters financial difficulties and fails to pay future benefits.

The SECURE Act creates a new fiduciary safe harbor
protecting fiduciaries from such lawsuits provided that they engage in an objective, thorough and analytical search for annuity providers. Instead of having to investigate the financial condition of insurers themselves, they will now be able to complete a checklist of diligence items that rely on state insurance regulator determinations of factors such as whether the insurance company has adequate reserves. However, fiduciaries must still determine that the fees are reasonable.

Portability of Annuity Options

If a plan with annuities subsequently eliminates them, participants will now be able to roll their contracts over or to receive a distribution of an annuity contract.

New Required Notice of Annuity Value

Once the Department of Labor issues guidance, the SECURE Act will also require defined contribution plan sponsors to provide participants with an annual notice of the monthly income their account balances will provide. The hope is that the annuity calculations will serve as a wakeup call to participants who are not contributing enough to their plans.

Employers interested in implementing these options may wish to wait for formal guidance interpreting the SECURE Act provisions before moving forward. It is also advisable to consult professional advisers about the detailed requirements to ensure compliance. But it is not too soon for employers to begin considering these new options to increase retirement savings.


Carol I. Buckmann, JD is the co-founding partner of Cohen & Buckmann, P.C. (www.cohenbuckmann.com). She is one of the top-rated employee benefits and ERISA attorneys in the U.S., and deals with some of the foremost issues in ERISA, including pension plan compliance, fiduciary responsibilities and investment fund formation.

The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of PenChecks Trust®, its subsidiaries or affiliates.


 

PTCA-2020010

Did you find this content helpful?

Related Insights
Comments

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

nineteen − 12 =

Topics

How to Fight Back Against Social Engineering Hackers

Have you or your business fallen victim to a social engineering scam? Are you concerned about having sensitive client data stolen from your computer network by a cyber hacker? If so, you’re not alone, as cyber security has become an ever-growing threat to individuals and companies around the globe.

SSRA and RSSA: The Next Step in GID (Getting It Done)?

I learned a long time ago that laws can be like sausage. They may look great but you don’t want to see them being made.1 That may also help explain how we get some of the unusual, sometimes pithy acronyms used for new legislation.

U.S. Supreme Court Rules On Fiduciary Responsibilities

Are plan fiduciaries protected from excessive fee lawsuits just because they offer participants a menu of investment funds that includes some low-fee investment choices? Or are plan sponsors and other fiduciaries required to do more than that?

PenChecks Named a San Diego Top Workplace

PenChecks Named a San Diego Top Workplace for 2021 in the San Diego Union-Tribune’s (UT San Diego) annual “Top Workplaces” contest. And now, thanks to our awesome employees, all of San Diego will know about it.

Zero Trust: The New Cybersecurity Paradigm

Cybersecurity technologies and methods used to protect a company’s data have significantly evolved over the last two decades. Unfortunately, so have the cyber criminals (hackers) who relentlessly pursue the riches to be made from stealing personal information and other sensitive data.

Recent Posts

How to Fight Back Against Social Engineering Hackers

Have you or your business fallen victim to a social engineering scam? Are you concerned about having sensitive client data stolen from your computer network by a cyber hacker? If so, you’re not alone, as cyber security has become an ever-growing threat to individuals and companies around the globe.

SSRA and RSSA: The Next Step in GID (Getting It Done)?

I learned a long time ago that laws can be like sausage. They may look great but you don’t want to see them being made.1 That may also help explain how we get some of the unusual, sometimes pithy acronyms used for new legislation.

U.S. Supreme Court Rules On Fiduciary Responsibilities

Are plan fiduciaries protected from excessive fee lawsuits just because they offer participants a menu of investment funds that includes some low-fee investment choices? Or are plan sponsors and other fiduciaries required to do more than that?

PenChecks Named a San Diego Top Workplace

PenChecks Named a San Diego Top Workplace for 2021 in the San Diego Union-Tribune’s (UT San Diego) annual “Top Workplaces” contest. And now, thanks to our awesome employees, all of San Diego will know about it.

Archives

Have an idea for a topic you don’t see here? Send us an email and we’ll look into it.

Subscribe to our newsletter to receive regular email updates on the latest happenings at PenChecks Trust® and in the retirement plan services industry.

SUBSCRIBE

Resources
Follow Us
Send this to a friend
Hi,
I saw this on the PenChecks Trust® website and thought you may be interested in this: https://penchecks.com/secure-act-takes-aim-at-the-retirement-savings-gap/